The hunter in the stone

The stone shows shiny spots in the sunlight, which suggests a fossil carrier. The following examination under the microscope should actually prove the assumption. Are treasonous also the traces drawn in different shades of color.

The animal was probably caused by a surprising event, e.g. it was killed or perished by physical impact. Another possibility is that injury or even mutilation of limbs resulted in the immediate death of the hunter.

Based on the oval eye pupils, it is obviously a carnivorous hunted animal, which is currently like the herbivorous "Parasaurolophus" lived in the Cretaceumhat (chalk) many million years ago (about 75 million). The rather hunter-like horn also shows that that it is a hunting animal. The rather sharp teeth are also another indication of a "hunter". The animal's original body drawing was likely different from can still be guessed from the fossilization. The area in the upper right corner of the picture may belong to the body.

Closer view of the mighty horn on the head. In the fossilization, the mouth area with the teeth is still good visible and suggests a rather dreaded figure 😱.

Picture on the left:Three years later, after another microscopy of the stone, further insights into the fossil discovery emerged. Although of course a lot can only be speculated about. It appears to have been an animal capable of flight that had wide wings. A crystallized bone structure could also be discovered under bright LED light, where even legs and feet could be clearly identified.
Picture on the right: The flying animal has a pillar-like structure on its head that ends similar to an axe. Perhaps it was a male who was able to impress the females with it, but perhaps it served more as an aerodynamic compensation for balancing the body's center of gravity (elevation) in the air or it simply served as a hunting instrument.

Picture on the left:As soon as it was known that this animal must have had wings, they could have looked something like what was shown in the microscopy. The wings must have had a large span, which could have had a sickle-curved shape. On the left side there is probably still the fragment of the right wing (viewed from the object).
Picture on the right: The left wing viewed from the animal in microscopy on the right is difficult to trace based on the fragments visible on the surface. The animal must also have had an even more impressive beak or pointed mouth than previously thought. -This can be identified by discovering additional tooth fragments under the microscope. The shape of the beak or mouth could have looked something like the sketch shown in the illustration. According to our own research, this object would have to be a pterosaur from the Jurassic Period or later Cretaceous period. So far I have not found a bird with a head like this in any literature. But I seem to remember a TV documentary many years ago in which an object like this was briefly shown using a computer animation or drawing.